Comparison

Gamma vs Decks.Studio — an honest comparison (2026)

Decks.Studio is built Arabic-first — full right-to-left, real signed documents, and sealed sharing. Gamma is a polished, popular AI deck tool. Here is a fair, sourced comparison.

Last verified: · competitor facts checked against gamma.app

CapabilityDecks.StudioGamma
AI deck from a prompt, file, link, or voice noteYes — incl. voice notePartial — files & URLs
Full Arabic UI + right-to-left, end to endYes — Arabic-firstPartial — RTL in beta; Arabic not a UI language
Real paginated A4/Letter documentsYesPartial — card-based; a card → a PDF page
E-signatures with an audit trailYes
Sealed “Sent Versions” (tamper-proof hash)Yes
Share control: password + revoke + PDF toggleYes — all threePartial — password (Pro)
Narrated video export (AI voiceover → MP4)Yes — up to 20/moNo — on their roadmap, unshipped
Slack alert when your deck is openedYes
Viewer analytics (who opened, time per slide)YesYes (Pro)
White-label / custom domainYesYes
Export to PDF · PowerPoint · WordPDF · PPTX · DOCXPDF · PPTX (no Word)
Template gallery36 slide templatesLarge gallery
Third-party integrationsGoogle Drive, Slack, WhatsApp~7 connectors (Zapier, Make, n8n…)
Languages for generationEnglish + Arabic (RTL-perfect)70+ languages
Free tierYes — 3 decks/moYes — 400 credits
Entry paid price$24/mo (Pro)— (pricing page blocked to us)

“—” = not documented on the competitor’s public pages (we don’t guess).

Gamma is a genuinely good product and the reason many people first tried AI decks. If your work is in English and you want fast, attractive slides, websites, and social posts, Gamma is a strong tool — this page is not here to pretend otherwise.

Decks.Studio is built for a different centre of gravity: Arabic and English as equals, right-to-left done properly end to end, and the parts of real business that a deck tool usually ignores — paginated A4/Letter documents, e-signatures bound to a content hash, and sealed “Sent Versions” a recipient can verify.

The table below compares only what we could confirm on Gamma’s own help and developer pages on the date shown. Where Gamma doesn’t document a capability, we mark it “—” rather than guess.

Where Decks.Studio wins

  • Full Arabic right-to-left, end to end — the editor, the documents, and every export.
  • Real paginated A4/Letter documents, e-signatures with an audit trail, and sealed "Sent Versions" a recipient can verify.
  • Controlled sharing: a password, a PDF-download toggle, and instant revoke.
  • Narrated video export — an AI voiceover per slide, rendered to MP4.
  • A permanent free tier: 3 decks a month, no card.

Where Gamma wins

Where Gamma wins, honestly: it is a mature category leader with a broader canvas — it generates presentations, docs, websites, and social posts, ships a large template gallery, and offers more third-party connectors (Zapier, Make, n8n, plus ChatGPT and Claude). It also generates in far more languages. If breadth and integrations matter more to you than Arabic depth or signed documents, Gamma may fit you better.

Questions

Does Gamma support Arabic and right-to-left?

Partly. Gamma’s help centre says right-to-left languages including Arabic are supported but currently in beta, and Arabic is not on its list of interface languages. Decks.Studio is Arabic-first: the whole product, editor, documents, and exports are right-to-left, end to end.

Can Gamma export to Word or a narrated video?

No on both, per Gamma’s own pages: its export formats are PDF, PNG, and PowerPoint (no Word), and narrated video is on its idea board but not shipped. Decks.Studio exports PDF, PowerPoint, and Word, and renders a narrated MP4 with an AI voiceover per slide.

Is Decks.Studio a Gamma clone?

No. They overlap on AI slide generation, but Decks.Studio adds real paginated documents, e-signatures bound to a content hash, sealed Sent Versions a recipient can verify, and true Arabic RTL — none of which Gamma documents.

Gamma vs Decks.Studio — an honest comparison (2026) · Decks.Studio